Recent issues of popular US backpacking magazine
Backpacker have shown an increased awareness of ultralight hiking techniques and gear. While this awareness certainly hasn't challenged the predominance of heavy equipment and traditional methods, the presence of a Hyperlight Mountain Gear tarp and a FlyWeight packraft earlier this year was pleasantly surprising.
Imagine my joy, then, at this month's cover:
Have I crossed over into an alternative dimension? Has Hell frozen over? There, right on the front page, for heaven's sake:
Ultralight Comfort: 12 Easy Ways to Shed Weight and Camp in Style.
I was naturally interested in what
Backpacker's idea of ultralight was. It often seems that the magazine is crippled by corporate sponsorship as the gear suggestions nearly always come from the big names: Patagonia, Mountain Hardwear, REI, the North Face, Arcteryx. Not that there's anything wrong with that: those companies make some great gear (albeit at the cost of brand-inflated prices – I'm looking at you, Arcteryx!). How would they fare at making an ultralight packing list from such brands? Could they get through the article ignore the entire ultralight cottage industry that has pretty much defined and established the niche market? I thought this would be an interesting opportunity to examine their recommendations and compare them to my own, and those of others in the UL blogosphere, and hopefully generate some commentary from other bloggers also.
As offering a more in-depth look at
Backpacker's 12 steps would make this the post to end all posts, I'm splitting each step into a separate post, transforming it into an Ultralight Makeover Guide which will be presented over the coming weeks.
So without further ado, let's take a look at step one in their programme for going ultralight, and see what we can improve upon.
1. Admit you have a problem.
Backpacker says: Load up your pack for a summer weekend trip. If it weighs more than 15lbs (7kg), you have a problem.
Backpacking North says: Well, this is a fair start. Not really a tip, but it's fair to say that if your
weekender weight is over 15lb, you probably fall into the heavyweight category. I think it's more than likely that most of the magazine's readership would be carrying packs
far in excess of 15lb – probably at least 30lb (14kg).
A 15lb/7kg load (assuming it includes food, fuel and water) is not particularly heavy. It falls into the category of lightweight packing:
> 20lb / 10kg = Heavyweight
12-20lb / 5-10kg = Lightweight
6-11lb / 3-5kg = Ultralight
< 6lb / 3kg = Super Ultralight
But beyond the figures, what does this all mean? In my opinion, not much. It doesn't really matter which category you fall into. Whether you end up lightweight or ultralight, it really doesn't matter. The ultimate goal is simply to lighten your load. It should be said that "super ultralighters" are extremely dedicated to the cause. To get that light takes a level of sacrifice in gear durability and comfort which you might not want to leap straight into. Better to take things one step at a time. As we'll see over the coming weeks, any attempt to lighten up requires a willingness to reconsider one's needs when backpacking. It necessitates cutting out luxury items (which are rarely, if ever, used), modifying techniques and the expectations you have of your gear. What it
doesn't mean is putting yourself through an endurance test. There's no reason not to indulge yourself in something that you like to take along with you. Lightening you load means taking that platy full of whisky all that much easier.
So why go ultralight? As mentioned above, the basic point it to make your load lighter. With a lighter load you can hike faster, further and put less of a burden on your body. Not that you
have to hike faster or further - the most important benefit in my opinion is the lessened burden on your body. A lighter load will make you less tired. You'll be more willing to pick up your pack again. You'll ache less. Perhaps most importantly, it'll be better for you in the long run. A light load facilitates hiking to a ripe old age.
 |
A heavyweight hiker in Northern Minnesota. Note the additional side packs.
This was a two-night trip. |
For me, the question is better put as why
wouldn't you go lighter? Why would anyone
want to haul a ton around on their back? Being in the wild shouldn't be an endurance test. I'd like to see a shift in people's mentality from boasting about how heavy their packs are, to how
light they are. Backpacking shouldn't be about
suffering – it should be about
enjoying. With a light pack, you'll soon find you don't even notice the weight on your back, and consequently you are able to give your full attention to the wonders that surround you. It's quite a transformation.
 |
| Yours truly on the same trip. |
But to get back to the issue of weight.
Backpacker's 15lb/7kg cut off point is a fair enough value to set as a starting point for reducing your pack weight. For a summer weekender, where weather and conditions fall within a fairly predictable range, you should easily be able to get your load under 15lb. And if you can get it down to 10lb (5kg) that's even better.
But how?
The first thing you need to do is address the core weight of heavy loads: your "big three" – sleeping, shelter, and pack. And as this has been covered far better by others, let's turn to them and see what they have to say on the matter.
Others say: There are a ton of websites and books covering ultralight backpacking, each with its own variation on a theme regarding the right approach. One of the clearest and simplest I've seen was by Jörgen Johansson at
Fjäderlätt. He espouses simple principle of 3 for 3 (or 343) that succinctly deals with reducing the weight of your "big three." Put simply, if you can get the total weight of your sleeping system, your shelter, and your pack down to 3kg (6.5lb) or less, you are well on your way to ultralight. 3 items for 3 kg. It's that simple.
Some sleeping bags alone weigh more than 2kg. Heavy, inefficient synthetic materials easily add up to a lot of weight. Tags, zips, hoods, and other bizzarre additions add even more. Before you know it, you're hauling around something enormous, about the same size, shape, and weight as
one of these.
Many traditional hikers rely on the venerable tent for shelter. But add up the weight of those heavy materials, the numerous poles used to create the sculpted geodesic work of art, and the additional footprint/groundsheet (to
protect those heavy materials) and soon you're looking at three or four kilos.
 |
My Haglöfs Genius 21 dome tent. Great shelter. Weighs a ton. It's actually quite complicated to put up.
Although I have a smaller solo Hileberg tent, I used to often take this anyway for the "extra space".
When I look back at those times, I think "Was I mad?" |
Then you dig out your pack – made of even more heavy-duty materials, with a floating suspension system, 24 pockets, and a bunch of plastic things that don't really seem to have a purpose – which itself weighs 2kg before you've even put anything inside it.
And then you realise; you have three items weighing around 7kg (15lb). And you haven't even packed your food and bottle of wine yet! Let along your stove and fuel. And your clothes. And all the gadgets.
But consider this: What if your sleeping system were to weigh 850g? Your shelter 700g? Your pack 450g? The total for your big three would be 2kg (4.5lb). A saving of 5kg (10.5lb). This is my typical summer 343 weight – and I am by no means a hardcore ultralighter. If I can do it, you can too.
 |
My current "medium" light weight setup, as outlined above, weighs approx. 2kg for the big three.
I still have plenty of extra space. |
Ultralight backpacking is all about cutting back to the basics, refining your equipment, and asking what you really need – and that is what we'll be looking at in the weeks ahead.
Part 2 – Downsize your pack >>
Links and resources (general info on lightening your load):
Fjäderlätt 343
Backpacking Light – Probably the best online community resource for reviews, information, and tips.
Nordic Lightpacking – Nordic lightweight mafiosi, with plenty of tips and trip reports.
Ryan Jordan - Do a ultralight course! Like the site says "Explore your wild side (without having to drink your pee.)"
Plus many, many, many blogs. Check the blogroll on the right to get starterd.
Stores
UK -
Ultralight Outdoor Gear
USA -
Prolite Gear
Manufacturers of ultralight gear – where often the best equipment is to be found – will be linked as relevant in the upcoming Ultralight Makeover posts.
Used Gear
Europe:
Nordic Lightpacking Gear Swap
USA:
Backpacking Light Gear Swap
Videos
Ultralight A-Z by
Hiking in Finland – Tired of reading? Hendrik Morkel has a project underway to make the first ever video A-Z of ultralight backpacking. You can be a part of the project by
supporting it on Kickstarter.
Magazines
Recent issues of popular US backpacking magazine
Backpacker have shown an increased awareness of ultralight hiking techniques and gear. While this awareness certainly hasn't challenged the predominance of heavy equipment and traditional methods, the presence of a Hyperlight Mountain Gear tarp and a FlyWeight packraft earlier this year was pleasantly surprising.
Imagine my joy, then, at this month's cover:
Have I crossed over into an alternative dimension? Has Hell frozen over? There, right on the front page, for heaven's sake:
Ultralight Comfort: 12 Easy Ways to Shed Weight and Camp in Style.
I was naturally interested in what
Backpacker's idea of ultralight was. It often seems that the magazine is crippled by corporate sponsorship as the gear suggestions nearly always come from the big names: Patagonia, Mountain Hardwear, REI, the North Face, Arcteryx. Not that there's anything wrong with that: those companies make some great gear (albeit at the cost of brand-inflated prices – I'm looking at you, Arcteryx!). How would they fare at making an ultralight packing list from such brands? Could they get through the article ignore the entire ultralight cottage industry that has pretty much defined and established the niche market? I thought this would be an interesting opportunity to examine their recommendations and compare them to my own, and those of others in the UL blogosphere, and hopefully generate some commentary from other bloggers also.
As offering a more in-depth look at
Backpacker's 12 steps would make this the post to end all posts, I'm splitting each step into a separate post, transforming it into an Ultralight Makeover Guide which will be presented over the coming weeks.
So without further ado, let's take a look at step one in their programme for going ultralight, and see what we can improve upon.
1. Admit you have a problem.
Backpacker says: Load up your pack for a summer weekend trip. If it weighs more than 15lbs (7kg), you have a problem.
Backpacking North says: Well, this is a fair start. Not really a tip, but it's fair to say that if your
weekender weight is over 15lb, you probably fall into the heavyweight category. I think it's more than likely that most of the magazine's readership would be carrying packs
far in excess of 15lb – probably at least 30lb (14kg).
A 15lb/7kg load (assuming it includes food, fuel and water) is not particularly heavy. It falls into the category of lightweight packing:
> 20lb / 10kg = Heavyweight
12-20lb / 5-10kg = Lightweight
6-11lb / 3-5kg = Ultralight
< 6lb / 3kg = Super Ultralight
But beyond the figures, what does this all mean? In my opinion, not much. It doesn't really matter which category you fall into. Whether you end up lightweight or ultralight, it really doesn't matter. The ultimate goal is simply to lighten your load. It should be said that "super ultralighters" are extremely dedicated to the cause. To get that light takes a level of sacrifice in gear durability and comfort which you might not want to leap straight into. Better to take things one step at a time. As we'll see over the coming weeks, any attempt to lighten up requires a willingness to reconsider one's needs when backpacking. It necessitates cutting out luxury items (which are rarely, if ever, used), modifying techniques and the expectations you have of your gear. What it
doesn't mean is putting yourself through an endurance test. There's no reason not to indulge yourself in something that you like to take along with you. Lightening you load means taking that platy full of whisky all that much easier.
So why go ultralight? As mentioned above, the basic point it to make your load lighter. With a lighter load you can hike faster, further and put less of a burden on your body. Not that you
have to hike faster or further - the most important benefit in my opinion is the lessened burden on your body. A lighter load will make you less tired. You'll be more willing to pick up your pack again. You'll ache less. Perhaps most importantly, it'll be better for you in the long run. A light load facilitates hiking to a ripe old age.
 |
A heavyweight hiker in Northern Minnesota. Note the additional side packs.
This was a two-night trip. |
For me, the question is better put as why
wouldn't you go lighter? Why would anyone
want to haul a ton around on their back? Being in the wild shouldn't be an endurance test. I'd like to see a shift in people's mentality from boasting about how heavy their packs are, to how
light they are. Backpacking shouldn't be about
suffering – it should be about
enjoying. With a light pack, you'll soon find you don't even notice the weight on your back, and consequently you are able to give your full attention to the wonders that surround you. It's quite a transformation.
 |
| Yours truly on the same trip. |
But to get back to the issue of weight.
Backpacker's 15lb/7kg cut off point is a fair enough value to set as a starting point for reducing your pack weight. For a summer weekender, where weather and conditions fall within a fairly predictable range, you should easily be able to get your load under 15lb. And if you can get it down to 10lb (5kg) that's even better.
But how?
The first thing you need to do is address the core weight of heavy loads: your "big three" – sleeping, shelter, and pack. And as this has been covered far better by others, let's turn to them and see what they have to say on the matter.
Others say: There are a ton of websites and books covering ultralight backpacking, each with its own variation on a theme regarding the right approach. One of the clearest and simplest I've seen was by Jörgen Johansson at
Fjäderlätt. He espouses simple principle of 3 for 3 (or 343) that succinctly deals with reducing the weight of your "big three." Put simply, if you can get the total weight of your sleeping system, your shelter, and your pack down to 3kg (6.5lb) or less, you are well on your way to ultralight. 3 items for 3 kg. It's that simple.
Some sleeping bags alone weigh more than 2kg. Heavy, inefficient synthetic materials easily add up to a lot of weight. Tags, zips, hoods, and other bizzarre additions add even more. Before you know it, you're hauling around something enormous, about the same size, shape, and weight as
one of these.
Many traditional hikers rely on the venerable tent for shelter. But add up the weight of those heavy materials, the numerous poles used to create the sculpted geodesic work of art, and the additional footprint/groundsheet (to
protect those heavy materials) and soon you're looking at three or four kilos.
 |
My Haglöfs Genius 21 dome tent. Great shelter. Weighs a ton. It's actually quite complicated to put up.
Although I have a smaller solo Hileberg tent, I used to often take this anyway for the "extra space".
When I look back at those times, I think "Was I mad?" |
Then you dig out your pack – made of even more heavy-duty materials, with a floating suspension system, 24 pockets, and a bunch of plastic things that don't really seem to have a purpose – which itself weighs 2kg before you've even put anything inside it.
And then you realise; you have three items weighing around 7kg (15lb). And you haven't even packed your food and bottle of wine yet! Let along your stove and fuel. And your clothes. And all the gadgets.
But consider this: What if your sleeping system were to weigh 850g? Your shelter 700g? Your pack 450g? The total for your big three would be 2kg (4.5lb). A saving of 5kg (10.5lb). This is my typical summer 343 weight – and I am by no means a hardcore ultralighter. If I can do it, you can too.
 |
My current "medium" light weight setup, as outlined above, weighs approx. 2kg for the big three.
I still have plenty of extra space. |
Ultralight backpacking is all about cutting back to the basics, refining your equipment, and asking what you really need – and that is what we'll be looking at in the weeks ahead.
Part 2 – Downsize your pack >>
Links and resources (general info on lightening your load):
Fjäderlätt 343
Backpacking Light – Probably the best online community resource for reviews, information, and tips.
Nordic Lightpacking – Nordic lightweight mafiosi, with plenty of tips and trip reports.
Ryan Jordan - Do a ultralight course! Like the site says "Explore your wild side (without having to drink your pee.)"
Plus many, many, many blogs. Check the blogroll on the right to get starterd.
Stores
UK -
Ultralight Outdoor Gear
USA -
Prolite Gear
Manufacturers of ultralight gear – where often the best equipment is to be found – will be linked as relevant in the upcoming Ultralight Makeover posts.
Used Gear
Europe:
Nordic Lightpacking Gear Swap
USA:
Backpacking Light Gear Swap
Videos
Ultralight A-Z by
Hiking in Finland – Tired of reading? Hendrik Morkel has a project underway to make the first ever video A-Z of ultralight backpacking. You can be a part of the project by
supporting it on Kickstarter.
Magazines
Ultralight Makeover: Redux Pt. 1
This is great Mark! I've shared to Facebook as I have a few friends who are still old school, not really being aware of the alternative. Education is key, then at least they can make informed choices.
ReplyDeleteI also like how you're tried to reference UK and European sites for reference too - nice for us over this side of the Atlantic!
Your weight ranges are off bit FYI. UL is < 10 base and SUL is < 5 FSO.
ReplyDeleteCome now, Chris. You know as well as I that these figures are not set in stone. There are as many different definitions of what is and what is not UL/SUL as there are people who practise it. It also varies as to which side of the Atlantic you happen to be on, and whether you metric or imperial. The figures I quoted are in the ball park: whether UL is 6-11lb or less that 10lb is pretty moot.
ReplyDeleteI'm talking pack weights, and these are taken from Jolly Green Giant's site as an arbitrary measure (http://jolly-green-giant.blogspot.com/). I feel they are about right. As for full skin-out weight, I don't go there. My wife can't stand me running around the house naked while weighing things.
As I said, though, this isn't about defining and fitting into categories, it's about enjoying the outside more.
Thanks, Helen. I thought it would be interesting to round up some of the gear and techniques favoured by people, and to widen the scope of the original article a little. Focusing not so much on the latest and coolest gear, but gear that has proven popular and worthy.
ReplyDeleteI'll try to keep up the Euro and US references as much as possible, and plan to also highlight gender differences in gear (if and when relevant).
I disagree. SUL is sub five base, not FSO.
ReplyDeleteMy bad - I was thinking XUL.
ReplyDeleteSince Wikipedia is a far more trusted source than any of our individual sites, I use those numbers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultralight_backpacking
ReplyDeleteGood link - thanks. Of course anyone can edit Wikipedia... but still, I have to re-emphasize my point: Isn't it more important to encourage a reduction in weight, rather than argue about a 1lb difference in definitions?
ReplyDeleteRe: Wikipedia - That might be true (I actually think you have to be a trusted source now), but it's heavily policed. Try putting in some bad info and it'll be corrected promptly.
ReplyDeleteYes, the reduction is more important than categories and if that's the emphasis you mean to get across, I wouldn't even bother listing them. Just my 2 cents. :-)
Actually, I think you'll find that's 3 cent's worth ;)
ReplyDeleteHi Mark, Good post. Whenever I am in the States on business I always get Backpacker magazine at the airport news stand just to see the differences between US & Europe.
ReplyDeleteI have my big three down to 3 kg and that is for spring until the beginning of winter. It goes up quite a bit in the winter with a 2 kg Hilleberg Soulo tent and a Exped Down mat, but I don't like to comprise comfort in the winter !!
Mark
Thanks Mark. I don't mean to knock Backpacker too harshly. I've been subscribing for a couple of years but I'm not renewing this year - partially because I'm moving back to Europe, and partly because every issue seems to be a repeat these days. I enjoyed reading it at first though. I'm curious what Euro magazines you recommend? TGO? Anything else?
ReplyDeleteWinter is a different kettle of fish altogether, I agree. I was looking online today an saw that Mountain Hardware are releasing a direct competitor to the Black Diamond Firstlight. 1.3kg. Not too shabby. I'm also looking into a warmer mat for winter.
Backpacker does seem extremely gear and advertisement oriented from a
ReplyDeleteEuropean perspective, while it still lacks real gear tests.
I think just about every outdoor magazine repeats itself. I've read the Swedish Utemagasinet for about 15 years and it has the same problem for me. The Finnish magazine Retki is not really hit that hard with the problem, but is perhaps not as good as the others. The Norwegian magazine Ute seems ok, but I haven't read enough of it yet. The German Outdoor is too focused on Germany for me. I don't think I've seen the British magazines in the Finnish stores, but I guess TGO should be good.
If I was to write an article on going light, it'd end up similar to this one. My attitude toward the whole UL thing seems to be the same as yours. It's not about labels, it's about getting the pack weight down to be barely noticeable on the climbs...
ReplyDeleteI've taken it about as far as I need, and it's about far enough mostly in terms of the comfort vs weight I'm carrying [in summer at least, winter needs more work].
I avoid places like BPL, as I dislike the pissing matches and pedantry which seem to be a regular occurrence there. Mostly a small [well, it was once small] selection of blogs have informed and transformed my pack contents.
I agree with you and Peter that magazines do repeat themselves and probably the only new stuff is new gear. In my comments I was referring more to the differences that the US and Europe have in approach and gear rather than magazines . My favorite mag however is TGO and with the recent revamp, I think it is one of the best in the market. See my post http://markswalkingblog.wordpress.com/2011/06/10/re-vamped-tgo-magazine/ just in case you have not see this Stateside.
ReplyDeleteNice post, Mr. Roberts, and curious to see the next eleven installments!
ReplyDeleteAlso many thanks for putting a link to me in there, I'm honored!
I looked at a couple of the old TGOs, but I can only get them in Zinio, which is pretty awful for reading magazines. I did see your TGO post - the new design looks good.
ReplyDeleteI wish there was a "European" magazine - one that covered the whole of Europe, as Backpacker covers the whole of the USA. It would be really nice to find out about routes in other countries more.
Cheers, Fraser. I totally agree. Get your weight down, and don't worry about the details too much. It's interesting to measure the weight of your load every now and then just to get an idea of how you're doing.
ReplyDeleteI tend to avoid the pissing matches on BPL. It is a good place to read about techniques and gear - they have some very detailed pieces which are great if you're looking for that sort of thing. There are far worse places than BPL, too... I've found the folks on the BPL forums to be (generally) pretty positive.
I guess if people want to get really obsessed with weights and definitions that's fine, but I don't think that's the way to get people into making their packs lighter. Dogmatism is never very welcoming. People should just chill, man, and look at the flowers :)
Cheers, Mr. Morkel! I doubt I will be covering any radical new ground for converted UL'ers, but expect to find yourself referenced again :) I'm planning on highlighting the excellent reviews that my wonderful blogging comrades have written.
ReplyDeleteProblem with the UL or SUL is the fixation with the weight. Who cares if its 1.9kg. What matters is the trip needs for kit selection and getting the lightest pack base weight for the intended trip. If all someone does is fixate on how they walked into a wood for an overnight trip with 2kg of kit they missed the point. For example why take a shelter if the two day trip has no rain forecast? Why take a stove when you could build say a fire if they are permissible. Maybe the fire will keep you warm so skip the quilt? Truth is John Muir walked the high mountains in a coat to keep warm and a blanket to sleep under. Going super light is not new. Kit matches the trip needs, not a fixed point of I must have sub 2.5kg base weight. Nice post Mark.
ReplyDeleteVery true, Martin. Conditions vary, and equipment needs vary enormously with them. While I like the idea of getting by with a blanket and a fire, I find I prefer to be prepared for surprises. Not having rain in the forecast is always nice, but would you really trust that? I know I wouldn't in Lapland, nor England for that matter. So a lot of that really depends on location and environment. You need to know the potential range of expectations wherever you plan to hike, and that's all about experience, research, and knowledge (a subject of a later part in the series). Fortunately, knowledge, once you've acquired it, weighs very little.
ReplyDeleteI have often wrote knowledge weighs nothing. In fact the things that make a trip happen are fitness, map reading and planning skills and desire to finish. They all weight nothing.
ReplyDeleteOn the notion of some that the goal is the lightest of everything. Think stoves. The lightest stove is not always the lightest over seven days once fuel is added into the equation. A jetboil flash can be less in weight over a week with no re-supply of fuel vs a light esbit stove as the Jetboil can be more fuel efficient. Sometimes the base weight is not always the issue. What matters is the weight over the whole trip. Phil Turner took a jetboil on this years Challenge based on calculations he did. I left mine at home and regretted it.
I don't trust forecasts by the way but often an overnight trip could not need a shelter if it is good weather. We I believe can do without a lot of things we think we need. Multi purpose kit is key as well in terms clothing and sleep systems. I leave you with this question. Ever thought of sleeping in the warm sun of the day and walking under the stars of night to see and experience a different outdoor trip. Would you need a shelter that weekend? So agin the need of the trip is what the kit selection should focus on and not some pr set limit to boast about.
Awesome post! You've really compiled a lot of great info here for anyone thinking about making the switch. I personally am pretty happy if I walk out the door with a 12lb base weight or less, depending on the situation.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Joslyn! Part two is coming this week...
ReplyDeleteGreat article, looking forward to part two!
ReplyDeleteI just recently replaced my backpack, the last of the big three to go light for me. So in Summer at least I am only at around 1.5 Kg for the three (although that's without any tarp/tent). Around 600 g for the pack, 500 g for a mat, and around 300 g for a VBL and liner. It's definitely made a big difference to trips, most often I throw my pack on and then have to take it off and double check I have packed everything because it just feels empty.
Excellent post and good resources Mark. Looking forward to part 2.
ReplyDeleteWait no longer, Joe :)
ReplyDeleteAnd thanks!
So what gear did you get? Come on, tell all! :)
ReplyDeleteI got a Huckepack in red Xpac, a Thermarest z lite mat, and the VBL/Bivy/sleeping bag is a super cheap Adventure Medical Kits Thermo-Lite Bivy. Having just a VBL and liner is a great way to leave gear at home and still sleep warm, but I can say it's not for everyone. Most people find it pretty disgusting actually :)
ReplyDeleteGreat sense of humor.
ReplyDeleteWise words as well, but about tents....a tent without musquitonet, like a tarp?
I do not believe in tarps, they do not protect against insects, snakes and dogs.
Maybe in some situations they are okay, but think about all the poles you need to keep the thing in place...
And a hammock under a tarp? Looks romantic, definitely, but what is the point of using a hammock or tarp when you have tents less then one and a half kilos?
Pete I think if you read part 3 - which deals specifically with shelters - you'll find reasonable answers to your questions:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.backpackingnorth.com/2011/08/ultralight-makeover-redux-pt-3-ditch.html
As I often point out, your shelter choice should be based on the needs of your environment, but many people use tarps (as I do) quite happily in bug-infested areas. You just need to use a bivy bag or bug inner. As for "all the poles you need", the SpinnTwinn and most other designs use two trekking poles, so in fact you don't need to carry any additional poles - a considerable advantage over tents.
I've never camped anywhere where I've had to worry about dog attacks, but if I were I would probably want to rethink my entire camping strategy. Does anything provide adequate protection other than, say, a cabin (or maybe a hotel)?
The hammock point doesn't really stand up though. A simple reversal of the argument is equally valid: what is the point of using a tent when you have hammocks or tarps less than 500g?
In the end though, it's all down to personal choice, If you're happy with what you have, stick with that. I'm simply encouraging people to consider lightening their loads, and pointing out that the options available for doing so are multiple.
Indeed indeed,
ReplyDeleteI am not saying that one thing is always better, if only it would be that easy. I just cycled two months in northern Spain. Had a tent. Heard about people who woke up because some Dog came to check out their tarp,
My tent weighs almost four kilo, yes I know, and I will get a two maybe three kilo tent,
In Spain during some parts of the days there were annoying insects. I was happy inside my tent! Snakefree too.
I am not sure what a tarp, poles and bivibag weigh, but probably just as much as a Hubba?
Hotels are quite safe for hikers who do not like dogs, even though I once spent some time in a hotel where the nightguard had his office, and when he left to do something, he locked the door to protect the guests from his best friend, a cute huge pittbul that would stare and drool at you through the thin glazing of the locked door. But that's another forum.
Hammock need trees and trees are not always in the right spot. '' Mazeta ''!
Must admit, never slept under a tarp, or in a hammock, but I suppose with the right climate and ( lack of) animal life it can be good.
Hi!
ReplyDeleteNice articles! I'm hoping for more!
Inspirational ideas.
I have been trying to lower my baseweight for a long time. Haven't succeeded to much in your categroies I'm still a heavyweihter.
I mostly hike in northern skandinavia and am usually not hiking alone. Most of you ultralight people seem to be walking solo. Is that because you are to extreme or everyone takes his/her own gear.
I at least hike with one more person, either my girlfriend och a frind who is a unconvincable superultraheavy hiker. But he carys it without complaining. My friends are not that convinced it is worth the money and hassle to go lighter.
The thing is that it makes it harder for me to go lighter.
You need a two person tent, a bigger pot, more food etc.
I do not want to critique going light- I want to.
But not having the largest amount of money and will to buy as pecifik shelter, pack, sleepingbag for every trip or occasion i use my stuff for everything wich makes it heavier.
When I buy new i try to get the lightest affordable and accessible gear.
Unfortunatelly I bought my downsack nearly 10 years ago ant then I was on a eaven strickter budget. Now it is what I think good in cold lappland but not the lightest. Unfortunatelly down has a long life :)
Mostely when Im summerhikng in teh swedisch woods my bag is to warm and heavy, but I think it dosn't matter that much if you dont have to pack to much food.
In Lapland on my last long trip, Sarek 10 days with 4 other people in august I had a baseweight of ca 12 kg.
My big three are: 6,6kg
Hilleberg Nallo 2 (living two pers every night) ca 2,2 kg (older version)
Arcteryx Bora 80 carried everything with no space spare for more food (ca 14 kg food) ca 3,2 CCF mat older + Mountain Equipment Glacier 750, good for ca -10C and 1,2 kg.
Plus ca 6 kg clothes and nicknacks.
I thought it was quite good but the catch is:
On ashorter trip I have to take the same stuff because its all I have.
What do you recommend?
Sell the Bora, buy a new backpack that is lighter, but how do I carry 26 kg (inkl food) on my next trip? Buy another for shorter trips?
Don't hike with friends? No way!
Buy another Sleepingbag? Which?
Buy another shelter?
Buy another cooking system? Which suitable for at least two people (Optimus crux Weekender?)
There is a lot of buing involved as you see. And I have a lighter pack and then I'll have to carry other poples stuff.
Cheers Benjamin