Finally, the Holy Grail...
Anticipation over the arrival of neu kid on the block Laufbursche has risen to fever pitch among the ultra-light community. I'd been trying to get my oversized giant hands on a huckePACK after reading
Hendrik's many evangelising posts for months, but German bureaucracy cuts no red tape for bloggers, and as time went by I opted to get a MLD Burn as a small summer bag.
As winter rolled in, I began to evaluate my pack needs again. I wanted another pack, a light weight one, but durable, and large enough to accommodate bulky insulated gear for colder weather. The word on the street was that Mateusz at Laufbursche had finalized his pack designs, and amongst his offerings would be a larger huckePACK. With the help of
Ben at hrXXLight, I made contact with Laufbursche, and after playing with his rather clever configurator, I ordered a huckePACK "big," with an XL torso size, carrying a maximum capacity of 57 litres, and, with the two hip pockets, weighing in at 524g on my highly-accurate IKEA scales (the listed weight was 522g, so pretty damn close!).
And so, without further ado, let me introduce you to a new friend...
For the purposes of this quick overview, I used a mat to give it some structure, and stuffed a down bag and jacket in to fill it up.
The first thing that strikes you is the quality. The workmanship really is top par. Not a stitch out of place, and everything neatly, and sturdily finished.
Perhaps the most obvious "innovation" in the huckePACK is the design of the lid, and even the fact that there is one. Most light weight packs today skip the lid altogether in favour of a roll-top and cinch cord closure - the argument being that this is waterproof enough, and that a lid serves no real purpose.
On the huckePACK, the lid doubles as a kind of roll top. It's a very distinctive, neat, and tidy. It's a design that makes the Laufbursche packs immediately identifiable. It is also quite hard to explain how it closes, but with the aid of a not particularly helpful photograph, I'll try.
It's actualy very simple. The neck of the pack folds down on top, and can be clipped inside (using the clip in the photo above) to secure the contents if the bag is overflowing. The lid is essentially a continuation of the back material which folds over everything and clips into a pair of lineloc fasteners.
It makes for a very secure and waterproof lid. I was surprised that the lid also has a pocket. It's been a long time since I used a pack with a lid and lid pocket, and it seems almost consciously unfashionable to include one.
But then again, why not? I suppose I can always find something to put in the pocket. A map... My Super Mica... Some sliced cheese... The argument against it would be that it adds unnecessary weight, and limits the possibility of compacting the pack as you would be able to with a extension roll-top. As is is, I like the design, but I'm holding back judgement on the practicality of it until I've taken it out a few times.
Moving on... The shoulder straps are very well designed, and, with the 6mm 3D mesh padding, amazingly comfortable. I find their S shape makes them almost unnoticeable. Thoughtfully, they have plenty of webbing attachment points, a removable sternum strap, and load lifters. Many UL packs skip the load lifters, but even with moderate-light loads, they make a huge difference in how the pack carries.
Mateusz seemed somewhat surprised when I ordered the XL torso size, but it was the right choice. The length is perfect, with the belt sitting nicely on my hips (my MLD Burn sits a little high).
In another clever little design feature, the hip belt can be secured out of the way behind the pack if you don't need to use it. I think as this is intended to carry a larger load, I'm likely to use it. It's comfy - a little padding goes a long way, but again, we'll see how it performs when it gets a real test.
I ordered the belt pockets, because that's the kind of guy I am. I like to have snacks, and my GPS at hand, and the pockets are plenty large enough to fit my
Lumix GF1
. They came fitted to the pack, and are nicely secured with a set of clips, so no bothersome slippage will occur.
The pack comes with additional cord and shock cord to attach in any way you choose. One option is to create a holder on the back for a section of Z-Lite. I've not done this yet, but I'll give it a go. I'm a little uncertain that it will keep the Z-Lite in place on a long hike. The method
Gossamer Gear use on the
Gorilla where the pad slips into some webbing pockets seems more secure, but we'll see.
 |
| © Laufbursche |
There are plenty of attachment loops all over the pack to tie cord to. I'll probably tie a few on for trekking poles. An ice-axe loop would be easy to create for those with such an inclination.
The mesh pockets are more than ample - huge in fact. Loads of space for DuoMids, waterproofs, knickknacks, water bottles etc. The right side pocket is angled, the left side straight, but with an access hole, so in theory wearers should be able to easily get to water. My arms never seem to be flexible enough for that though.
So, as you can see, it's a well thought out pack, with a few innovative features, made to exacting standards. I'm hoping I can get out and try it in some real conditions very soon.
It's available in "small" and "big" sizes, and in Dyneema X Gridstop or Cuben Fiber. Laufbursche will also be offering a smaller pack (more akin to the Burn) called the huckePÄCKchen in Cuben Fiber (it looks very nice, and very small).
Laufbursche will hopefully be opening their online store very soon, but until then, those with an itch to scratch can
try contacting them for more info.
I wish them every success and can't wait to try out more of their gear in the future.

Finally, the Holy Grail...
Anticipation over the arrival of neu kid on the block Laufbursche has risen to fever pitch among the ultra-light community. I'd been trying to get my oversized giant hands on a huckePACK after reading
Hendrik's many evangelising posts for months, but German bureaucracy cuts no red tape for bloggers, and as time went by I opted to get a MLD Burn as a small summer bag.
As winter rolled in, I began to evaluate my pack needs again. I wanted another pack, a light weight one, but durable, and large enough to accommodate bulky insulated gear for colder weather. The word on the street was that Mateusz at Laufbursche had finalized his pack designs, and amongst his offerings would be a larger huckePACK. With the help of
Ben at hrXXLight, I made contact with Laufbursche, and after playing with his rather clever configurator, I ordered a huckePACK "big," with an XL torso size, carrying a maximum capacity of 57 litres, and, with the two hip pockets, weighing in at 524g on my highly-accurate IKEA scales (the listed weight was 522g, so pretty damn close!).
And so, without further ado, let me introduce you to a new friend...
For the purposes of this quick overview, I used a mat to give it some structure, and stuffed a down bag and jacket in to fill it up.
The first thing that strikes you is the quality. The workmanship really is top par. Not a stitch out of place, and everything neatly, and sturdily finished.
Perhaps the most obvious "innovation" in the huckePACK is the design of the lid, and even the fact that there is one. Most light weight packs today skip the lid altogether in favour of a roll-top and cinch cord closure - the argument being that this is waterproof enough, and that a lid serves no real purpose.
On the huckePACK, the lid doubles as a kind of roll top. It's a very distinctive, neat, and tidy. It's a design that makes the Laufbursche packs immediately identifiable. It is also quite hard to explain how it closes, but with the aid of a not particularly helpful photograph, I'll try.
It's actualy very simple. The neck of the pack folds down on top, and can be clipped inside (using the clip in the photo above) to secure the contents if the bag is overflowing. The lid is essentially a continuation of the back material which folds over everything and clips into a pair of lineloc fasteners.
It makes for a very secure and waterproof lid. I was surprised that the lid also has a pocket. It's been a long time since I used a pack with a lid and lid pocket, and it seems almost consciously unfashionable to include one.
But then again, why not? I suppose I can always find something to put in the pocket. A map... My Super Mica... Some sliced cheese... The argument against it would be that it adds unnecessary weight, and limits the possibility of compacting the pack as you would be able to with a extension roll-top. As is is, I like the design, but I'm holding back judgement on the practicality of it until I've taken it out a few times.
Moving on... The shoulder straps are very well designed, and, with the 6mm 3D mesh padding, amazingly comfortable. I find their S shape makes them almost unnoticeable. Thoughtfully, they have plenty of webbing attachment points, a removable sternum strap, and load lifters. Many UL packs skip the load lifters, but even with moderate-light loads, they make a huge difference in how the pack carries.
Mateusz seemed somewhat surprised when I ordered the XL torso size, but it was the right choice. The length is perfect, with the belt sitting nicely on my hips (my MLD Burn sits a little high).
In another clever little design feature, the hip belt can be secured out of the way behind the pack if you don't need to use it. I think as this is intended to carry a larger load, I'm likely to use it. It's comfy - a little padding goes a long way, but again, we'll see how it performs when it gets a real test.
I ordered the belt pockets, because that's the kind of guy I am. I like to have snacks, and my GPS at hand, and the pockets are plenty large enough to fit my
Lumix GF1
. They came fitted to the pack, and are nicely secured with a set of clips, so no bothersome slippage will occur.
The pack comes with additional cord and shock cord to attach in any way you choose. One option is to create a holder on the back for a section of Z-Lite. I've not done this yet, but I'll give it a go. I'm a little uncertain that it will keep the Z-Lite in place on a long hike. The method
Gossamer Gear use on the
Gorilla where the pad slips into some webbing pockets seems more secure, but we'll see.
 |
| © Laufbursche |
There are plenty of attachment loops all over the pack to tie cord to. I'll probably tie a few on for trekking poles. An ice-axe loop would be easy to create for those with such an inclination.
The mesh pockets are more than ample - huge in fact. Loads of space for DuoMids, waterproofs, knickknacks, water bottles etc. The right side pocket is angled, the left side straight, but with an access hole, so in theory wearers should be able to easily get to water. My arms never seem to be flexible enough for that though.
So, as you can see, it's a well thought out pack, with a few innovative features, made to exacting standards. I'm hoping I can get out and try it in some real conditions very soon.
It's available in "small" and "big" sizes, and in Dyneema X Gridstop or Cuben Fiber. Laufbursche will also be offering a smaller pack (more akin to the Burn) called the huckePÄCKchen in Cuben Fiber (it looks very nice, and very small).
Laufbursche will hopefully be opening their online store very soon, but until then, those with an itch to scratch can
try contacting them for more info.
I wish them every success and can't wait to try out more of their gear in the future.
First Impressions: Laufbursche huckePACK
Nice post! I will be receiving one soon too. What is your height and torso length? I ordered the Large - just hope it fits well
ReplyDeleteI am a fan but it's not for me. I like the back-system on the Gorilla (the curved aluminium stay and the sit-light pad mesh pockets) and the enormous shoulder straps. It's so comfortable. Conversely, my Gorilla is 690g (for just over 40 litres), but yours is 524g for 57 litres. 'Nuff said. That said, it's a fantastic looking pack and I like dyneema - it has been very effective on my OMM Villain. I think you'll enjoy this Mark!
ReplyDeleteThomas: I'm around 187cm, and my torso, if I remember, was 57cm. Enjoy yours when it arrives!
ReplyDeleteMaz: I like what I've read about the Gorilla, and the back system is really nicely done. I also like that you can fill the straps with socks and such - a clever idea. How heavy is it without the stay? I'm pretty pleased with it so far, but of course the proof of the pudding etc etc.
I've only used a huckePACK for a short amount of time but it was all I needed to confirm the attention to detail and quality of construction. Very impressive. The shoulder pads are comfortable and the lid is innovative and is actually a really good idea in countries where torrential downpours are a regular occurrence. Like Maz I'm really happy with my Gorilla and I prefer it's back pad system. My Gorilla weighs 624g with hip-belt and aluminium stay. For short trips I remove them and it weighs 434g.
ReplyDeleteThat's a good point about the lid and rain, Joe. Sitting here looking out the window at the snow I was forgetting that it also rains! The lid would be good in a relentless downpour (although I note that he recommends an inner bag for wet weather).
ReplyDeleteWithout the stay and hip belt, the Gorilla is pretty light!
My Gorilla (large torso, medium hipbelt) weighs 690g with stay and hipbelt but I have use it without both. I tend to use a pack cover but the Gorilla does make it difficult as the shoulder straps, if it is not full, are right at the top. Small things which I can live with.
ReplyDeleteIt looks fantastic and well made. I wont be getting one. I am to a Gorilla convert. Perfection is in a Gorilla. It has a niggle here and there. But still it is perfection as on the hill I forget I have it on. A pack should do that. Also the Gorilla is made of durable materials. We seem to be on more about the Gorilla pack here than yours. I must apologise. But Maz and Joe turned me.
ReplyDeleteThe Gorilla is an interesting pack to compare it to (as I did in the article). I am still tempted by one, as an 'inbetween' pack.
ReplyDeleteWith the huckePACK big, the main competitor for my money was the GoLite Pinnacle. I wanted a light winter pack capable of taking plenty of puffy down gear and other insulation. The the extra volume of the huckePACK (57l) over the Gorilla (40l) is quite significant. And while I also like the Pinnacle, I felt 70l was maybe a little too big for my needs.
Both packs - the Gorilla and Pinnacle - seem to be great. I wonder if it is possible to have too many packs...
Nice one, Mark. Your inbetween pack should be the huckePACK Small or the huckePÄCKchen - I know they will be mine ;)
ReplyDeleteThe huckePACK is in another league in regards to quality, attention to detail and craftsmanship when compared to the Gorilla or Pinnacle. They know how to make UL gear, yes, but superior quality is something different. It's like comparing a Audi and a Fiat!
Oh, Hendrik! Now you're going to start a war in the comments on GG vs. GoLite vs. Laufbursche and quality. Duck for cover everyone! :)
ReplyDeleteIndeed, the huckePACK small would be the real Gorilla comparison. For my small, summer pack I have the Burn, which is about as small as I can get with my gear. I think the huckePÄCKchen is even smaller (26-32l).
C'mon, its with tongue-in-cheek! But you can not compare Made in Asia with what Mateusz does, the man is a perfectionist. And some of the GG packs I have seen could also have been sewn a bit better (example: Mariposa comes with two left side hipbelts, one on the right, one on the left!). Yes, they work fine, but it is nice if its done well.
ReplyDeleteI will need to have a post on this, I see.
My tongue was firmly in my cheek also. I have removed it now. Two left hipbelts? Really?
ReplyDeleteOn what will your post be, precisely? Pack comparisons or huckePÄCKchen?
Hendrik - I am appalled by your comments in relation to my darling Gorilla! How dare you?! Hold on a minute, the stitching did come away a bit in my Gorilla's back...damn it! Also - Audi vs Fiat? Not sure which way your analogy goes - Fiat have a long history of beautiful, performance cars whilst Audi on the other hand have always been well-engineered but lacking in imagination (I have one, before everyone yells at me). Now Audi and Hyundai, that's another matter...
ReplyDeleteMark - "I wonder if it is possible to have too many packs..." For God's sake man - if Mrs M hears you saying that, she'll think she's justified in 'cleaning up' my gear cupboard! Now, where is my VISA Debit card...
Any idea how I can get my hands on one? I've been wanting one ever since the first news of them came out. I've contacted Mr. Mateusz by email three times, but never got a reply.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDear Folks!
ReplyDelete@mark
Thank you very much for the great
first impression post.
@all
Hey Guys, don't argue to much about
the packs.
All the backpacks of GG and MLD are
also very nice and well made.
I think there are no major quality
differences. But the all Backpacks
are a little bit different and
everyone has his own unique features.
And everybody off you has his own
special requirements related to a
backpack. That's the reason why
there are so many different
backpacks on the market.
@butuki
Is this true? I always try to
answer on every mail that I
receive. Please feel free to
try it again;)
All the best,
Laufbursche
Maz, if the Audi R8 lacks imagination, I really don't know if I can help you :D
ReplyDeleteI gladly say it again: There is nothing wrong with any pack from anyone. They're light, well made, and stand a lot of abuse. There's nothing wrong with any of them. However, if I compare the here presented pack with other packs I own and have seen, then the here presented pack is, in my (subjective) opinion better made. Nobody needs to agree with that, everyone is free to have his/ her own opinion. What works for me, and what I might perceive as high quality, might not be seen like that by you, and vice versa.
Mark, you'll see ;)
Well, made it might be but is it up to the task? Thin hip-belt and no frame wont equal the carry comfort of a Gorilla I would wager. I also thing the mesh sections and foam insert option on a Gorilla makes it a better back panel system. The huckePACK is in another league in regard to quality but I don't know if it is in regards to carrying winter kit when the weight creeps up a bit. Price wise will the extra cost buy better performance or just better stitching?
ReplyDeleteMartin, I carried 17 kg is in it - yes, it is up to the task. Re: Price, what did you pay for the Gorilla after shipping, taxes and ransom? Likely the same you would pay for a huckePACK sent from Europe.
ReplyDeleteI'm not going to expand here on the subject, it is too subjective. One likes thick hipbelts and frames, others prefer perfect craftsmanship and the best UL materials available. In the end, everyone is happy.
Maz: Multiple packs are essential. I'm sure Mrs. M understands :)
ReplyDeleteLaufbursche: You are very welcome!
Martin, Hendrik: Agreed, they are different bags for different purposes and needs. For me, the Gorilla isn't big enough as a winter bag - I want the ability to carry extra bulk, rather than weight. If I needed to carry a lot more, I'd probably pull a pulk.
All this talk of winter hiking has me thinking of maps...
Mark - nice looking pack and a great weight for the pack size. I have several packs at present, with the Pinnacle for winter bulky use - which I like very much despite being heavier. With the snow we have at the moment in the UK - a Pulk would be ideal :)
ReplyDeleteMark
37lb in weight? I own a Pinnacle which has a best a 30lb limit with comfort and I am challenged by others on that. I cant see how that pack could carry any better than a Pinnacle? No frame, no more substantial hip belt or shoulder straps. It is well made and credit to the maker of it for the craftsmanship - but I don't see that it is going to be a 35lb plus carry weight pack.
ReplyDeleteMartin: Here the Packlist. After two days I was Guide and carried an additional 3 kg of GPS, Satphone, FA kit. I own a Pinnacle as well, and it does not carry as well as the huckePACK. Frame is built through packing a rucksack correctly. It doesn't need substantial hip or shoulder straps, the ones in this pack are well up to the task, even if the recommended max weight is 12 kg.
ReplyDeleteThat is a fine pack then Hendrik. One I would like to look at sometime.
ReplyDeleteThe R8 - now that's special car. Handbuilt and beautiful. I agree with you there!
ReplyDelete